Cleared Special

K021033 - STIMUPLEX-DIG-RC NERVE STIMULATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2003
Decision
357d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K021033 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the STIMUPLEX-DIG-RC NERVE STIMULATOR. Classified as Stimulator, Nerve, Battery-powered (product code BXN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by B.Braun Medical, Inc. (Allentown, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 21, 2003 after a review of 357 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.2775 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all B.Braun Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K021033 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 29, 2002
Decision Date March 21, 2003
Days to Decision 357 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
218d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 357d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code BXN Stimulator, Nerve, Battery-powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.2775
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.