Cleared Traditional

K022124 - GALEMED PEAK FLOW METER, MODELS 3751/3752 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2003
Decision
276d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K022124 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the GALEMED PEAK FLOW METER, MODELS 3751/3752. Classified as Meter, Peak Flow, Spirometry (product code BZH), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Galemed Corp. (Wu-Jia, I-Lan, TW). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 3, 2003 after a review of 276 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.1860 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Galemed Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K022124 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 01, 2002
Decision Date April 03, 2003
Days to Decision 276 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
137d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 276d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BZH Meter, Peak Flow, Spirometry
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.1860
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.