Cleared Traditional

SCLERAL PLUGS, 19 AND 20 GAUGE (K022186) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2003
Decision
236d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K022186 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SCLERAL PLUGS, 19 AND 20 GAUGE. Classified as Plug, Scleral (product code LXP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Microvision, Inc. (Seabrook, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 26, 2003 after a review of 236 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4155 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Microvision, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K022186 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 05, 2002
Decision Date February 26, 2003
Days to Decision 236 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
126d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 236d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LXP Plug, Scleral
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4155
Definition Intended To Provide Temporary Closure Of A Scleral Incision During An Ophthalmic Procedure.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.