Cleared Traditional

K022386 - POCKETCHEM UA AUTION STICKS 10TA (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K022386 · Arkray, Inc. · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2002
Decision
57d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K022386 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the POCKETCHEM UA AUTION STICKS 10TA. Classified as Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative) (product code JIL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Arkray, Inc. (Beverly, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 17, 2002 after a review of 57 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1340 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Arkray, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K022386 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 22, 2002
Decision Date September 17, 2002
Days to Decision 57 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
31d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 57d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JIL Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1340
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.