Cleared Traditional

K024342 - RADIOGRAPHIC FILM PROCESSOR, MODELS XP400 AND XP1000 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K024342 · Daito Co., Ltd. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2003
Decision
117d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K024342 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RADIOGRAPHIC FILM PROCESSOR, MODELS XP400 AND XP1000. Classified as Processor, Radiographic-film, Automatic (product code IXW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Daito Co., Ltd. (Manchester, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 23, 2003 after a review of 117 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1900 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Daito Co., Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K024342 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 27, 2002
Decision Date April 23, 2003
Days to Decision 117 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
10d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 117d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IXW Processor, Radiographic-film, Automatic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.