Cleared Traditional

K033173 - MICRO TARGETING ELECTRODE

K033173 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for MICRO TARGETING ELECTRODE, manufactured by FHC, Inc.. The device is a Class 2 Neurology device with product code GZL cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 175-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2004
Decision
175d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K033173 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MICRO TARGETING ELECTRODE. Classified as Electrode, Depth (product code GZL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by FHC, Inc. (Bowdoinham, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 24, 2004 after a review of 175 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.1330 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all FHC, Inc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K033173

510(k) Number K033173 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 01, 2003
Decision Date March 24, 2004
Days to Decision 175 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
27d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 175d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

GZL Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code GZL Electrode, Depth
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.1330
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.