Cleared Abbreviated

SD360 DIGITAL RECORDER/SD360 HOLTER DIGITAL RECORDER (K041901) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2004
Decision
48d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K041901 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SD360 DIGITAL RECORDER/SD360 HOLTER DIGITAL RECORDER. Classified as Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory (without Analysis) (product code MWJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by North East Monitoring, Inc. (Shelton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 31, 2004 after a review of 48 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.2800 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all North East Monitoring, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K041901 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 14, 2004
Decision Date August 31, 2004
Days to Decision 48 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
77d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 48d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code MWJ Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory (without Analysis)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.2800
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.