Cleared Traditional

N ANTISERA TO HUMAN COMPLEMENT FACTORS (C3C, C4) (K050665) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K050665 · Dade Behring, Inc. · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2005
Decision
48d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K050665 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the N ANTISERA TO HUMAN COMPLEMENT FACTORS (C3C, C4). Classified as Complement C3, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code CZW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dade Behring, Inc. (Newark, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 2, 2005 after a review of 48 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5240 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Dade Behring, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K050665 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 15, 2005
Decision Date May 02, 2005
Days to Decision 48 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
56d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 48d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CZW Complement C3, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5240
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.