Cleared Traditional

CRONUS GUIDEWIRE, MODEL 001-001470-1 (K051373) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2005
Decision
197d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K051373 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CRONUS GUIDEWIRE, MODEL 001-001470-1. Classified as System, Catheter Or Guidewire, Steerable (magnetic) (product code NDQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Stereotaxis, Inc. (Saint Louis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 9, 2005 after a review of 197 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1290 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Stereotaxis, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K051373 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 26, 2005
Decision Date December 09, 2005
Days to Decision 197 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
49d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 197d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NDQ System, Catheter Or Guidewire, Steerable (magnetic)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1290
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.