Cleared Traditional

CYCLOSPORINE EXTENDED RANGE ASSAY (CSAE) FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, CATALOG # DF108 (K052017) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2005
Decision
37d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K052017 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CYCLOSPORINE EXTENDED RANGE ASSAY (CSAE) FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, CATALOG # DF108. Classified as Cyclosporine (product code MKW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dade Behring, Inc. (P.O. Box 6101, Newark, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 1, 2005 after a review of 37 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1235 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Dade Behring, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K052017 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 26, 2005
Decision Date September 01, 2005
Days to Decision 37 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
50d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 37d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MKW Cyclosporine
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1235
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.