Cleared Special

K052085 - STANDARD, SPECIAL, SPECIAL+, SNEEDLE B-TYPE AND SNEEDLE J-TYPE ACUPUNCTURE NEEDLES (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2005
Decision
73d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K052085 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the STANDARD, SPECIAL, SPECIAL+, SNEEDLE B-TYPE AND SNEEDLE J-TYPE ACUPUNCTURE NE.... Classified as Needle, Acupuncture, Single Use (product code MQX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Asia-Med GmbH and CO KG (Littleton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 14, 2005 after a review of 73 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5580 - the FDA general hospital device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Asia-Med GmbH and CO KG devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K052085 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 02, 2005
Decision Date October 14, 2005
Days to Decision 73 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
56d faster than avg
Panel avg: 129d · This submission: 73d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code MQX Needle, Acupuncture, Single Use
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5580
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.