Cleared Traditional

WATER FILLED TEETHER (K052105) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K052105 · Royal Industries (Thailand) Public Co. , Ltd. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2005
Decision
89d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K052105 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the WATER FILLED TEETHER. Classified as Ring, Teething, Fluid-filled (product code KKO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Royal Industries (Thailand) Public Co. , Ltd. (Krathumban, TH). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 31, 2005 after a review of 89 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.5550 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Royal Industries (Thailand) Public Co. , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K052105 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 03, 2005
Decision Date October 31, 2005
Days to Decision 89 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
38d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 89d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KKO Ring, Teething, Fluid-filled
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.5550
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.