Cleared Abbreviated

DUAL-SIDED INTERHEMISPHERIC SUBDURAL ELECTRODES, GRID SUBDURAL ELECTRODES, INTRAOPERATIVE SUBDURAL ELECTRODES (K053363) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2006
Decision
179d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K053363 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DUAL-SIDED INTERHEMISPHERIC SUBDURAL ELECTRODES, GRID SUBDURAL ELECTRODES, IN.... Classified as Electrode, Cortical (product code GYC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corp (Stoughton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 30, 2006 after a review of 179 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.1310 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corp devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K053363 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 02, 2005
Decision Date May 30, 2006
Days to Decision 179 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
31d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 179d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code GYC Electrode, Cortical
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.1310
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.