Cleared Traditional

K061450 - HOSPIRA LATEX-FREE ADVANCED SENSOR CATHETERS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Also includes:
HOSPIRA LATEX-FREE CRITICAL CARE CATHETERS

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2006
Decision
71d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K061450 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HOSPIRA LATEX-FREE ADVANCED SENSOR CATHETERS. Classified as Catheter, Oximeter, Fiber-optic (product code DQE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hospira, Inc. (Lake Forest, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 4, 2006 after a review of 71 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1230 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Hospira, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K061450 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 25, 2006
Decision Date August 04, 2006
Days to Decision 71 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
54d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 71d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DQE Catheter, Oximeter, Fiber-optic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1230
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.