Cleared Traditional

K061497 - SYREX HEPARIN LOCK FLUSH SYRINGE, 1 UNIT/ML & 2 UNITS/ML (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2007
Decision
268d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K061497 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SYREX HEPARIN LOCK FLUSH SYRINGE, 1 UNIT/ML & 2 UNITS/ML. Classified as Heparin, Vascular Access Flush (product code NZW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Excelsior Medical Corp. (Neptune, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 23, 2007 after a review of 268 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5200 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Excelsior Medical Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K061497 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 31, 2006
Decision Date February 23, 2007
Days to Decision 268 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
139d slower than avg
Panel avg: 129d · This submission: 268d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NZW Heparin, Vascular Access Flush
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5200
Definition Enhance The Performance Of Intravascular Catheters, To Maintain Patency Of The Vascular Catheter When It Is Not In Use.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.