Cleared Traditional

K061999 - DRY LASER IMAGER, DRYPRO MODEL 832 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K061999 · Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2006
Decision
32d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K061999 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DRY LASER IMAGER, DRYPRO MODEL 832. Classified as Camera, Multi Format, Radiological (product code LMC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc. (Hachioji-Shi, JP). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 15, 2006 after a review of 32 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.2040 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K061999 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 14, 2006
Decision Date August 15, 2006
Days to Decision 32 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
75d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 32d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LMC Camera, Multi Format, Radiological
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.2040
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.