Cleared Special

RESOLVE TONGS, SMALL/MEDIUM, RESOLVE TONGS, MEDIUM/LARGE, MODEL JT-200D, JT-100D (K071173) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2007
Decision
28d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K071173 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RESOLVE TONGS, SMALL/MEDIUM, RESOLVE TONGS, MEDIUM/LARGE, MODEL JT-200D, JT-100D. Classified as Tong, Skull For Traction (product code HAX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ossur Americans (Formerly the Jerome Group) (Paulsboro, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 25, 2007 after a review of 28 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5960 - the FDA neurology device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Ossur Americans (Formerly the Jerome Group) devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K071173 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 27, 2007
Decision Date May 25, 2007
Days to Decision 28 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
120d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 28d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code HAX Tong, Skull For Traction
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5960
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.