Cleared Traditional

XPERT 40 SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM (K071233) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K071233 · Kub Technologies, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2007
Decision
48d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K071233 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the XPERT 40 SPECIMEN RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM. Classified as Cabinet, X-ray System (product code MWP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Kub Technologies, Inc. (Shelton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 20, 2007 after a review of 48 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1680 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Kub Technologies, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K071233 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 03, 2007
Decision Date June 20, 2007
Days to Decision 48 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
59d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 48d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MWP Cabinet, X-ray System
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1680
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.