Cleared Traditional

K071484 - PERIACRYL 90

K071484 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for PERIACRYL 90, manufactured by Glustitch, Inc.. The device is a Class 2 Dental device with product code EMA cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 133-day FDA review.

K071484 · Glustitch, Inc. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2007
Decision
133d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K071484 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PERIACRYL 90,80,70,60, MODEL9010, 8020, 7030, 6040. Classified as Cement, Dental (product code EMA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Glustitch, Inc. (Delta, CA). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 10, 2007 after a review of 133 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3275 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Glustitch, Inc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K071484

510(k) Number K071484 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 30, 2007
Decision Date October 10, 2007
Days to Decision 133 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
6d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 133d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

EMA Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code EMA Cement, Dental
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3275
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.