Cleared Traditional

ASCA-CHEK (K071711) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K071711 · Techlab Inc., Corporate Research Center · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2007
Decision
138d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K071711 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ASCA-CHEK. Classified as Antibodies, Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (s.cerevisiae) (product code NBT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Techlab Inc., Corporate Research Center (Blacksburg, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 7, 2007 after a review of 138 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5785 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Techlab Inc., Corporate Research Center devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K071711 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 22, 2007
Decision Date November 07, 2007
Days to Decision 138 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
34d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 138d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NBT Antibodies, Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (s.cerevisiae)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5785
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.