Cleared Special

K072062 - UCP MULTIPLE DRUG SCREEN TEST CUPS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Toxicology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2007
Decision
55d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K072062 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the UCP MULTIPLE DRUG SCREEN TEST CUPS. Classified as Radioimmunoassay, Tricyclic Antidepressant Drugs (product code LFG), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ucp Biosciences, Inc. (San Jose, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 20, 2007 after a review of 55 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3910 - the FDA toxicology device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Ucp Biosciences, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K072062 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 27, 2007
Decision Date September 20, 2007
Days to Decision 55 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
32d faster than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 55d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code LFG Radioimmunoassay, Tricyclic Antidepressant Drugs
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3910
Definition Intended To Measure Any Of The Tricyclic Antidepressant Drugs In Serum Or Urine.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.