Cleared Traditional

K072290 - PEGASO V, NEGAVENT RESPIRATOR, MODEL: DA-3 PLUS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2008
Decision
287d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K072290 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PEGASO V, NEGAVENT RESPIRATOR, MODEL: DA-3 PLUS. Classified as Ventilator, External Body, Negative Pressure, Adult (cuirass) (product code BYT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dima Italia Srl (Boulder, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 29, 2008 after a review of 287 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5935 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Dima Italia Srl devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K072290 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 16, 2007
Decision Date May 29, 2008
Days to Decision 287 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
148d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 287d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BYT Ventilator, External Body, Negative Pressure, Adult (cuirass)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5935
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.