Cleared Traditional

K081823 - MASTERSCREEN PAED - BABY BODY (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2009
Decision
325d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K081823 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MASTERSCREEN PAED - BABY BODY. Classified as Plethysmograph, Pressure (product code CCM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Viasys Healthcare GmbH (Hoechberg, DE). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 18, 2009 after a review of 325 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.1750 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Viasys Healthcare GmbH devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K081823 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 27, 2008
Decision Date May 18, 2009
Days to Decision 325 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
186d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 325d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CCM Plethysmograph, Pressure
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.1750
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.