Cleared Traditional

DXRAD MODELS DX800 OR DX808 DIGITAL DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS (K082261) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2008
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K082261 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DXRAD MODELS DX800 OR DX808 DIGITAL DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS. Classified as System, X-ray, Stationary (product code KPR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dxrad Solutions , Ltd. (Deer Field, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 6, 2008 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1680 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Dxrad Solutions , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K082261 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 08, 2008
Decision Date November 06, 2008
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KPR System, X-ray, Stationary
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1680
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - KPR System, X-ray, Stationary

All 116
Devices cleared under the same product code (KPR) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K082261.
Multix Fusion Max
K162971 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Nov 2016
MULTIX FUSION VA30 & VA40
K142049 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Dec 2014
YSIO MAX
K133259 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Jan 2014
YSIO
K081722 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Aug 2008
KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 3000 SYSTEM 64KW/80KW GENERATORS, MODELS 6551345, 6551386
K060550 · Eastman Kodak Company · Mar 2006
REVOLUTION XR/D DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM WITH TOMOSYNTHESIS
K051967 · Ge Healthcare · Aug 2005