Cleared Traditional

K082455 - RECTANGULAR MULTIPLACE HYPERBARIC CHAMBER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2009
Decision
269d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K082455 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RECTANGULAR MULTIPLACE HYPERBARIC CHAMBER. Classified as Chamber, Hyperbaric (product code CBF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Gulf Coast Hyperbarics, Inc. (Lynn Haven, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 22, 2009 after a review of 269 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5470 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Gulf Coast Hyperbarics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K082455 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 26, 2008
Decision Date May 22, 2009
Days to Decision 269 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
130d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 269d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBF Chamber, Hyperbaric
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5470
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.