Cleared Traditional

K083766 - PHOGLASS CEM

K083766 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for PHOGLASS CEM, manufactured by S & C Polymer GmbH. The device is a Class 2 Dental device with product code EMA cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 74-day FDA review.

K083766 · S & C Polymer GmbH · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF) Official FDA 510(k) Summary (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2009
Decision
74d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K083766 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PHOGLASS CEM. Classified as Cement, Dental (product code EMA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by S & C Polymer GmbH (Elmshorn, DE). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 2, 2009 after a review of 74 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3275 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K083766

510(k) Number K083766 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 18, 2008
Decision Date March 02, 2009
Days to Decision 74 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
54d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 74d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

EMA Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code EMA Cement, Dental
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3275
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.