Cleared Traditional

K092186 - VPAP TX

K092186 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for VPAP TX by Resmed, Ltd.. It is a Class 2 Anesthesiology device (product code MNS) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 154-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2009
Decision
154d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K092186 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VPAP TX. Classified as Ventilator, Continuous, Non-life-supporting (product code MNS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Resmed, Ltd. (San Diego, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 22, 2009 after a review of 154 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5895 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Resmed, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K092186 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 21, 2009
Decision Date December 22, 2009
Days to Decision 154 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
14d slower than avg
Panel avg: 140d · This submission: 154d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence.

Device Classification

Product Code MNS Ventilator, Continuous, Non-life-supporting
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5895
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. Clinical trial data may be submitted as supporting evidence to strengthen the substantial equivalence argument. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.

Clinical Evidence

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00850434 Completed Interventional Industry-sponsored

Improved Automatic CPAP Algorithm to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Study of an Improved Automatic CPAP Algorithm for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

20
Patients (actual)
1
Site
Treatment
Purpose
Double blind
Masking
Condition studied Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
Study design Crossover
Eligibility All sexes · 18 Years+
Principal investigator Klaus Schindhelm, PhD
Sponsor ResMed (industry)
Started 2005-11-01 Primary completion 2008-09-01 Completed 2008-11-01
Primary outcome
Physiological sleep signals including EEG, Sp02, respiratory effort and nasal flow, will be recorded, analysed and reported in the form of a series of indices, which are the outcome variables of the study.
Study completed - no results published. This trial concluded in 2008 but has not posted results to ClinicalTrials.gov. Completed studies without public results are common in industry-sponsored device trials; the data may be referenced in the 510(k) Summary PDF or remain unpublished.
View full study on ClinicalTrials.gov

Regulatory Peers - MNS Ventilator, Continuous, Non-life-supporting

All 35
Devices cleared under the same product code (MNS) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K092186.
BIPAP SYNCHRONY 2 WITH AF531 FULL FACE MASK
K101130 · Respironics, Inc. · Sep 2010
VPAP III ST-A
K093731 · Resmed, Ltd. · Mar 2010
BIPAP AVAPS VENTILATORY SUPPORT SYSTEM
K092818 · Respironics, Inc. · Jan 2010
BIPAP SYNCHRONY 2
K092043 · Respironics, Inc. · Aug 2009
BIPAP AUTOSV
K063540 · Respironics, Inc. · Feb 2007
BIPAP SYNCHRONY
K063533 · Respironics, Inc. · Feb 2007