Cleared Abbreviated

K092570 - ABX PENTRA TPU CAL, MODEL A11A01898 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

K092570 · HORIBA ABX SAS · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2009
Decision
56d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K092570 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ABX PENTRA TPU CAL, MODEL A11A01898. Classified as Calibrator, Secondary (product code JIT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by HORIBA ABX SAS (Montpellier, FR). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 16, 2009 after a review of 56 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1150 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all HORIBA ABX SAS devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K092570 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 21, 2009
Decision Date October 16, 2009
Days to Decision 56 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
32d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 56d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code JIT Calibrator, Secondary
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1150
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.