Cleared Special

THERATEST EL-BETA2GPI (IGM-IGG-IGA), THERATEST EL--BETA2GPI SCR (K092757) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2009
Decision
30d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K092757 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the THERATEST EL-BETA2GPI (IGM-IGG-IGA), THERATEST EL--BETA2GPI SCR. Classified as System,test,antibodies,b2 - Glycoprotein I (b2 - Gpi) (product code MSV), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Thera-Test Laboratories, Inc. (Lombard, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 9, 2009 after a review of 30 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5660 - the FDA immunology device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Thera-Test Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K092757 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 09, 2009
Decision Date October 09, 2009
Days to Decision 30 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
74d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 30d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code MSV System,test,antibodies,b2 - Glycoprotein I (b2 - Gpi)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5660
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.