Cleared Traditional

ASPIRATING SYRINGE, NON-ASPIRATING SYRINGE (K092943) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K092943 · Arnold Tuber Industries · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2009
Decision
78d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K092943 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ASPIRATING SYRINGE, NON-ASPIRATING SYRINGE. Classified as Syringe, Cartridge (product code EJI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Arnold Tuber Industries (Hamburg, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 11, 2009 after a review of 78 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.6770 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Arnold Tuber Industries devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K092943 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 24, 2009
Decision Date December 11, 2009
Days to Decision 78 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
49d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 78d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EJI Syringe, Cartridge
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.6770
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.