Cleared Traditional

REVLON RVSP3501 SPA MOISTURESTAY PARAFFIN BATH (TYPE SPB3752EA) (K093100) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Physical Medicine device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2009
Decision
54d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K093100 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the REVLON RVSP3501 SPA MOISTURESTAY PARAFFIN BATH (TYPE SPB3752EA). Classified as Bath, Paraffin (product code IMC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Shenzhen Comfort Technology Co., Ltd. (Austin, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 24, 2009 after a review of 54 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5110 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Shenzhen Comfort Technology Co., Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K093100 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 01, 2009
Decision Date November 24, 2009
Days to Decision 54 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review Yes - reviewed by an FDA-accredited third party
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
61d faster than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 54d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required. Third-party reviewed.

Device Classification

Product Code IMC Bath, Paraffin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5110
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.