Cleared Traditional

BGM GALECTIN -3 (K093758) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2010
Decision
345d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K093758 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BGM GALECTIN -3. Classified as Galectin-3 In Vitro Diagnostic Assay (product code OSX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bg Medicine, Inc. (Waltham, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 17, 2010 after a review of 345 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1117 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bg Medicine, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K093758 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 07, 2009
Decision Date November 17, 2010
Days to Decision 345 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
257d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 345d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OSX Galectin-3 In Vitro Diagnostic Assay
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1117
Definition Galectin-3 Is Indicated For Use In Conjunction With Clinical Evaluation As An Aid In Assessing The Prognosis Of Patients Diagnosed With Chronic Heart Failure.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.