Cleared Traditional

K100066 - DIABETESMANAGER SYSTEM, DIABETESMANAGER-RX SYSTEM MODEL VERSION 1.1 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2010
Decision
185d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K100066 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DIABETESMANAGER SYSTEM, DIABETESMANAGER-RX SYSTEM MODEL VERSION 1.1. Classified as Accessories, Pump, Infusion (product code MRZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Welldoc, Inc. (Baltimore, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 15, 2010 after a review of 185 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5725 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Welldoc, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K100066 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 11, 2010
Decision Date July 15, 2010
Days to Decision 185 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
57d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 185d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MRZ Accessories, Pump, Infusion
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5725
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.