Cleared Traditional

K100290 - ESTEMP NE

K100290 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for ESTEMP NE, manufactured by Spident Co., Ltd.. The device is a Class 2 Dental device with product code EMA cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 15-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2010
Decision
15d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K100290 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ESTEMP NE. Classified as Cement, Dental (product code EMA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Spident Co., Ltd. (Incheon, KR). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 17, 2010 after a review of 15 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3275 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Spident Co., Ltd. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K100290

510(k) Number K100290 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 02, 2010
Decision Date February 17, 2010
Days to Decision 15 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review Yes - reviewed by an FDA-accredited third party
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
113d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 15d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required. Third-party reviewed.

EMA Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code EMA Cement, Dental
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3275
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
MARC M MOUSER

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - EMA Cement, Dental

All 445
Devices cleared under the same product code (EMA) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K100290.
MALTA
K100756 · 3M Espe AG Dental Products · Jun 2010
UNICEM
K094007 · 3M Espe AG Dental Products · Apr 2010
CERAMIR CROWN & BRIDGE
K100510 · Doxa AB · Mar 2010
SELF ADHESIVE COMPOSITE LUTING CEMENT
K093338 · Dmg USA, Inc. · Feb 2010
DC PROVI CEM ESTHETIC, ESTHETIC MULTI F, IMPLANT
K091735 · S & C Polymer GmbH · Sep 2009
IONOLUX
K090817 · Voco GmbH · Jul 2009