Cleared Traditional

K100455 - SPAPLUS ANALYZER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K100455 · The Binding Site · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2010
Decision
198d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K100455 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SPAPLUS ANALYZER. Classified as Complement C4, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DBI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by The Binding Site (Los Angeles, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 3, 2010 after a review of 198 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5240 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all The Binding Site devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K100455 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 17, 2010
Decision Date September 03, 2010
Days to Decision 198 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
94d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 198d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DBI Complement C4, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5240
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.