Cleared Traditional

AESCULAP MONOMAX ABSORBABLE SUTURE (K100876) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II General & Plastic Surgery device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2010
Decision
106d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K100876 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AESCULAP MONOMAX ABSORBABLE SUTURE. Classified as Suture, Recombinant Technology (product code NWJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Aesculap, Inc. (Center Valley, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 14, 2010 after a review of 106 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the General & Plastic Surgery FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 878.4494 - the FDA general and plastic surgery device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General & Plastic Surgery review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Aesculap, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K100876 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 30, 2010
Decision Date July 14, 2010
Days to Decision 106 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General & Plastic Surgery (SU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
9d faster than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 106d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NWJ Suture, Recombinant Technology
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 878.4494
Definition Intended For Use In Soft Tissue Approximation. Indicated For Use In General Soft Tissue Approximation And/or Ligation.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General & Plastic Surgery devices follow this clearance model.