Cleared Traditional

EASYRA MICRO-ALBUMIN REAGENT AND CALIBRATOR (K101089) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2011
Decision
450d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K101089 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EASYRA MICRO-ALBUMIN REAGENT AND CALIBRATOR. Classified as Albumin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DCF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medica Corp. (Bedford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 13, 2011 after a review of 450 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5040 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Chemistry submissions.

View all Medica Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K101089 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 19, 2010
Decision Date July 13, 2011
Days to Decision 450 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
362d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 450d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DCF Albumin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5040
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.