Cleared Traditional

K101673 - URITEK TC-101 URINE ANALYZER, URINE REAGENT STRIPS 10, MODELS TC-101, URS-10 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2011
Decision
234d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K101673 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the URITEK TC-101 URINE ANALYZER, URINE REAGENT STRIPS 10, MODELS TC-101, URS-10. Classified as Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative) (product code JIL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Teco Diagnostics (Anaheim, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 4, 2011 after a review of 234 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1340 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Teco Diagnostics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K101673 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 15, 2010
Decision Date February 04, 2011
Days to Decision 234 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
146d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 234d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JIL Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1340
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.