Cleared Special

K101721 - WELL LEAD TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE AND DISPOSABLE INNER CANNULA (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2011
Decision
279d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K101721 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the WELL LEAD TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE AND DISPOSABLE INNER CANNULA. Classified as Tube, Tracheostomy (w/wo Connector) (product code BTO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Regulatory and Marketing Services, Inc. (Appollo Beach, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 24, 2011 after a review of 279 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5800 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Standard predicate reliance. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Regulatory and Marketing Services, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K101721 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 18, 2010
Decision Date March 24, 2011
Days to Decision 279 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
140d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 279d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code BTO Tube, Tracheostomy (w/wo Connector)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5800
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.