Cleared Traditional

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY SYSTEM (K102102) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K102102 · VATECH Co., Ltd. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2011
Decision
227d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K102102 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY SYSTEM. Classified as System, X-ray, Tomography, Computed (product code JAK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by VATECH Co., Ltd. (Secaucus, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 11, 2011 after a review of 227 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1750 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all VATECH Co., Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K102102 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 27, 2010
Decision Date March 11, 2011
Days to Decision 227 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
120d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 227d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JAK System, X-ray, Tomography, Computed
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1750
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - JAK System, X-ray, Tomography, Computed

All 352
Devices cleared under the same product code (JAK) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K102102.
SOMATOM PERSPECTIVE
K113287 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · May 2012
SAFIRE
K103424 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Nov 2011
GE VEO RECONSTRUCTION OPTION
K103489 · General Electric Co. · Sep 2011
SOMATOM DEFINITION AS
K103127 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Mar 2011
PHILIPS COMPREHENSIVE CARDIAC ANALYSIS (CCA) - PLAQUE ASSESSMENT TOOL
K092747 · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · Oct 2009
BRILLIANCE DUAL ENERGY OPTION
K090462 · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · Jun 2009