Cleared Traditional

ENVIEW (TM) (K102179) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K102179 · Carefusion 2200 · Gastroenterology & Urology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2010
Decision
121d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K102179 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ENVIEW (TM). Classified as Endoscope Holder (product code OCV), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Carefusion 2200 (San Diego, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 2, 2010 after a review of 121 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.1500 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Carefusion 2200 devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K102179 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 03, 2010
Decision Date December 02, 2010
Days to Decision 121 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
9d faster than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 121d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OCV Endoscope Holder
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.1500
Definition To Hold Endoscope In A Desired Position During Procedures.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.