Cleared Traditional

K110345 - SCANVIEW SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Pathology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2011
Decision
257d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K110345 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SCANVIEW SYSTEM. Classified as System, Automated Scanning Microscope And Image Analysis For Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (fish) Assays (product code NTH), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Applied Spectral Imaging (Haifa, IL). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 19, 2011 after a review of 257 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Pathology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.4700 - the FDA pathology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Pathology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Applied Spectral Imaging devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K110345 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 04, 2011
Decision Date October 19, 2011
Days to Decision 257 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Pathology (PA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
180d slower than avg
Panel avg: 77d · This submission: 257d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NTH System, Automated Scanning Microscope And Image Analysis For Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (fish) Assays
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.4700
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Pathology devices follow this clearance model.