Cleared Traditional

K110951 - 27+ ULTRAVIT PROBE, 27+ FLEX-TIP LASER PROBE, 27+ ENDOILLUMINATOR PROBE, 27+ VALVED ENTRY SYSTEM, 27+ INFUSION CANNULA (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2011
Decision
196d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K110951 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the 27+ ULTRAVIT PROBE, 27+ FLEX-TIP LASER PROBE, 27+ ENDOILLUMINATOR PROBE, 27+ .... Classified as Photocoagulator And Accessories (product code HQB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Alcon Research, Ltd. (Irvine, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 17, 2011 after a review of 196 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4690 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Alcon Research, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K110951 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 04, 2011
Decision Date October 17, 2011
Days to Decision 196 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
86d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 196d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HQB Photocoagulator And Accessories
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4690
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.