Cleared Traditional

K111881 - VIRTUE MALE SLING SYSTEM AND ALEXIS(R) WOUND RETRACTOR KIT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2011
Decision
47d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K111881 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VIRTUE MALE SLING SYSTEM AND ALEXIS(R) WOUND RETRACTOR KIT. Classified as Mesh, Surgical, For Stress Urinary Incontinence, Male (product code OTM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Coloplast A/S (Plymouth, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 17, 2011 after a review of 47 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 878.3300 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Coloplast A/S devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K111881 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 01, 2011
Decision Date August 17, 2011
Days to Decision 47 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
81d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 47d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OTM Mesh, Surgical, For Stress Urinary Incontinence, Male
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 878.3300
Definition Surgical Treatment Of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Post-prostatectomy
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.