Cleared Special

K112272 - EM44 SELF MONITORING BLOOD GLUCOSE SYSTEM, EM44 PRO SELF MONITORING BLOOD GLUCOSE SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2011
Decision
30d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K112272 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EM44 SELF MONITORING BLOOD GLUCOSE SYSTEM, EM44 PRO SELF MONITORING BLOOD GLU.... Classified as Glucose Dehydrogenase, Glucose (product code LFR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Eps Bio Technology Corp. (Hsinchu, TW). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 7, 2011 after a review of 30 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1345 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Eps Bio Technology Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K112272 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 08, 2011
Decision Date September 07, 2011
Days to Decision 30 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
58d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 30d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code LFR Glucose Dehydrogenase, Glucose
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1345
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.