Cleared Traditional

SNORKEL (K112766) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K112766 · Fellmar Company · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2012
Decision
256d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K112766 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SNORKEL. Classified as Device, Jaw Repositioning (product code LQZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Fellmar Company (Monrovia, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 4, 2012 after a review of 256 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.5570 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Fellmar Company devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K112766 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 22, 2011
Decision Date June 04, 2012
Days to Decision 256 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
129d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 256d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LQZ Device, Jaw Repositioning
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.5570
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.