Cleared Traditional

INTERLAB IFE TEST USING G 26 VER. 2.0 INSTRUMENT (K120169) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2012
Decision
218d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K120169 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the INTERLAB IFE TEST USING G 26 VER. 2.0 INSTRUMENT. Classified as Immunoelectrophoretic, Immunoglobulins, (g, A, M) (product code CFF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Grifols USA, LLC (East Stroudsburg, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 24, 2012 after a review of 218 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5510 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Grifols USA, LLC devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K120169 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 19, 2012
Decision Date August 24, 2012
Days to Decision 218 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
114d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 218d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CFF Immunoelectrophoretic, Immunoglobulins, (g, A, M)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5510
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.