Cleared Traditional

K120369 - HITACHI CLINICAL ANALYZER S TEST REAGENT CARTRIDGE GLUCOSE (GLU) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2012
Decision
94d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K120369 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HITACHI CLINICAL ANALYZER S TEST REAGENT CARTRIDGE GLUCOSE (GLU). Classified as Hexokinase, Glucose (product code CFR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, Inc. (Mountain View, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 10, 2012 after a review of 94 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1345 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K120369 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 06, 2012
Decision Date May 10, 2012
Days to Decision 94 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
6d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 94d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CFR Hexokinase, Glucose
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1345
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.