Cleared Traditional

K130951 - SIM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K130951 · Simavita Pty Limited · Gastroenterology & Urology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2013
Decision
139d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K130951 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SIM. Classified as Alarm, Conditioned Response Enuresis (product code KPN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Simavita Pty Limited (Washington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 22, 2013 after a review of 139 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.2040 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Simavita Pty Limited devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K130951 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 05, 2013
Decision Date August 22, 2013
Days to Decision 139 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
9d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 139d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KPN Alarm, Conditioned Response Enuresis
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.2040
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.