Cleared Traditional

K131979 - PROVANT THERAPY SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Physical Medicine device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2013
Decision
168d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K131979 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PROVANT THERAPY SYSTEM. Classified as Diathermy, Shortwave, For Use Other Than Applying Therapeutic Deep Heat (product code ILX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Regenesis Biomedical, Inc. (Scottsdale, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 13, 2013 after a review of 168 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5290 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Physical Medicine review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Regenesis Biomedical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K131979 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 28, 2013
Decision Date December 13, 2013
Days to Decision 168 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
53d slower than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 168d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code ILX Diathermy, Shortwave, For Use Other Than Applying Therapeutic Deep Heat
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5290
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.